I do not believe such a complicated choice could be explained well in this forum, but I prioritize latent magical ability, intelligence, physical prowess...
What's the balance there? Are they weighted? Is it a sum total kind of situation? If somebody was a buff genius would you consider them even if they were non-magical? Do you consider personality as a factor, given that it has a genetic component?
Though I am willing to make concessions on some aspects, I value their magical prowess most highly, so I shall not be making exceptions on that front.
Personality I do not think matters as terribly much... if they are foul tempered I need not have contact with them after the conception, so the effects on the child could be minimized.
Anonymity gives this forum every right to vent off some of the ill behaviour they display on a day to day basis. If we cannot tear one another down in person, then perhaps by dint of lingering words of malice not pinned to any vest. This is what happens when you bring people together from such different worlds as to think more the alien of one another.
My suggestion is to shrug off the worst of it, treat it for the silly fluff that it is, and vent your own grievances without paying mind to the answers you receive.
Sieglinde Sullivan | Kuroshitsuji
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-07-02 03:06 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-07-02 03:10 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-07-02 03:12 am (UTC)(link)+1000000
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-07-02 03:23 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-02 03:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-02 03:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-07-02 03:19 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-07-02 03:20 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-07-02 03:23 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Personality I do not think matters as terribly much... if they are foul tempered I need not have contact with them after the conception, so the effects on the child could be minimized.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-02 03:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-03 08:00 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-07-02 03:40 am (UTC)(link)My suggestion is to shrug off the worst of it, treat it for the silly fluff that it is, and vent your own grievances without paying mind to the answers you receive.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-07-02 03:07 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-07-02 05:37 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-07-02 06:12 am (UTC)(link)no subject